Dawson's Infamous Piltdown Man Paleontological Hoax

Dawson's Infamous Piltdown Man Paleontological Hoax

Writing for the The Jewish State newspaper, Arthur Goldberg and Michelle Cretella make the case that homosexuality has no known genetic links and therefore all who claim gay marriage is a “civil rights issue” are engaging in a dangerous science fiction.

The article offers expert opinion from a medical and legal perspective. Cretella is an M.D. who chairs the Sexuality Committee at the American College of Pediatricians, and Arthur Goldberg is a lawyer and executive secretary of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality.

In support of the claim that homosexuality is neither inborn or immutable, Goldberg and Cretella cite a prominent lesbian professor of developmental biology and gender studies at Brown University, Dr. Anne Fausto-Sterling:

[Although the claim that homosexuality is genetic] provides a legal argument that is, at the moment, actually having some sway in court, [f]or me, it’s a very shaky place. It’s bad science and bad politics.

The authors add that “more than 100 scientific studies indicate that change of sexual orientation is possible” and highlight a 2003 study by Dr. Robert Spitzer that found “dissatisfied homosexuals are able to make substantial long-term changes in orientation.”

But aren’t homosexual couples simply looking for the same long-term marriage living as everyone else? Goldberg and Cretella cite homosexual doctors David McWhirter and Andrew Mattison who, after a conducting a study on 156 male couples with a long term commitment, discovered that the average length of monogamy for those males was “under two years.” Goldberg and Cretella find additional support for this non-monogamous-couples experience from gay activist Andrew Sullivan, who claimed that homosexuals “have a need for extramarital outlets,” and lesbian writer Camille Paglia, who said gay magazines openly promote “the bigger bang of sex with strangers” and advocate “monogamy without fidelity.”

Goldberg and Cretella go on to address the health risks of homosexuality, citing  a 1997 International Journal of Epidemiology study which found homosexual males have a life span that is eight to 20 years lower than heterosexual men. After looking at the research, the authors write:

Higher parent mortality and promiscuity increased rates of domestic violence and greater rates of divorce are not healthy for children. Consequently, acceptance of gay marriage requires a disregard for the best interests of children. It follows logically that if marriage is defined merely by “who we love” regardless of what is in the best interest of children, then the government has no right to discriminate against those with other sexual orientations including orientations toward children or animals. This is why advocates of pedophilia, group marriage, bestiality and incest cite gay marriage victories as their own. It is also no coincidence that within 10 years of legalizing same-sex marriage every Scandinavian country legalized polygamy.

The article concludes that due to the grave social and personal costs of the broken family in the U.S., Americans need to strengthen traditional marriage law, not weaken it through spurious legal fictions.

Bachelorette Jillian Seeking Trad Marriage (ABC Press Photo)

Bachelorette Jillian Seeking Trad Marriage (ABC Press Photo)

While Wes revealed his boozy inner user after taking truth serum, and Tanner showed off his pervy side in his undies, Bachelorette Jillian Harris demonstrated once again that she’s “in it for the right reasons.”

In this week’s episode of ABC’s Bachelorette, the fashionable Vancouverite said her goodbyes to nice guy Jake and passed up the creepy-yet-irresistible smarm of Tanner’s foot massages and “blessed package.” As always, the graceful Jillian does it with class and with an eye to finding someone truly “fit for marriage.”

During her one-on-one date with Rob—after which she throws the young 25-year-old bartender from the train, quite literally—Ms. Harris says that she’d consider him more seriously if he had five or ten more years on him, noting that she’s ready to start a family.

It’s the insistent focus on children that marks Jillian Harris as this television season’s top spokesperson for traditional marriage. Unlike clueless lost souls Jon & Kate, who apparently think marriage is a commitment for “as long as we both shall love,” Harris knows marriage is about finding a suitable partner who will say “I do” to both her and to their future children at the altar, and provide for the daily care of the tribe for life. In a word, the girl “gets it”: marriage and family are the same word.

What do you think of this season’s Bachelorette Jillian? Will she be smart enough to dump the guitar-strumming Wes as recommended by Bachelorette royalty Trista Sutter? Will she hang on to Kiptyn and never let go? Will she finally figure out the heady but lovable Reid? Watch the YouTube video preview and find out what to expect next week as Jillian’s home-town dates bring the show into the home stretch.

Aggressive tactics used to attack supporters of traditional marriage are shocking, but are they legal?

That’s the question many are asking with regard to high-profile hits on traditional marriage supporters by so-called “gay rights advocates.”

In a June 9, 2009 article in The Advocate (“Anti-equality Domain Linked to KKK” also [1] [2] [3]), writer William McGuinness reports that Theodore Trentman, a self-described Web activist, is conducting an Internet smear campaign against the nation’s top marriage group, The National Organization for Marriage. According to the article, Trentman purchased the Web domain nationalorganizationformarriage.com but nefariously set the URL to redirect Web surfers to KKK.com, a Ku Klux Klan site.

The Advocate states that Mr. Trentman owns approximately 16 domain names, which he uses to similarly malign various groups. Trentman is quoted as saying that he “buys names that he feels members of the gay community should own.”

But why would Trentman, a downtown lofts owner at Los Angeles-based LoftLivingLA.com, carry out underhanded Web-based attacks on the National Organization for Marriage? The Advocate reports:

Theodore Trentman, the domain’s owner and a self-described Web advocate, said it’s no accident. Trentman bought the domain name on April 8, 2009, because he said the routing brought viewers to a closer representation of the certified 501(c)(4) nonprofit.

…Trentman said his decision to associate the KKK with the NOM came down to a personal feeling that the organization was representing a philosophy similar to the Knights Party — something he felt obligated to call out. “I think the National Organization for Marriage hosts a different message than they think they do,” Trentman said. “The true message is one of hate, division, and discrimination.”

The bait-and-switch URL trick has shown up at YouTube recently, where a video falsely claiming to be from the National Organization for Marriage , and posted by user “NationForMarraige” (note the misspelling), urges viewers to visit the group’s “new website.”  (See video documenting the NOM impostor.)  In a similar way reported in The Advocate, viewers who clicked on the link prior to June 20th were routed to the KKK.com Klan site. As of June 20th, the domain name began forwarding visitors to “Kindness, Kudos, and Kourage, the New KKKs of Living” — a Trent Studios page featuring Mr. Trentman’s music video productions, including the LOGO No.1 video of 2007, “This Is Love,” by Jason and Demarco.

Information reported in The Advocate aligns with registrant data at whois.domaintools.com, which says the domain name is registered by “Theodore Trentman” of  Trent Studios in Los Angeles, California. The address listed with the domain registrar is also the address of Los Angeles firm LoftLivingLA (loftlivingla.com).

maineAfter becoming the fifth state to legalize gay marriage on May 6, the State of Maine has seen its citizens rally to stop the law from going into effect. It appears that the new statewide strategy to oppose the redefined marriage law will follow California’s Proposition 8, which successfully amended California’s constitution to define marriage as being between one man and one woman.

(Take action now! Read end of blog entry to learn how you can easily help restore traditional marriage in Maine.)

At the signing of the gay marriage legislation last May, Governor John Baldacci announced that the same-sex statue would likely be challenged, adding that the people would ultimately need to decide the final outcome. “Even as I sign this important legislation into law,” said Baldacci, “I recognize that this may not be the final word…[The Maine constitution] guarantees that the ultimate political power in the State belongs to the people.”

The people of Maine have taken many cues from California’s 2008 strategy for protecting traditional marriage, even hiring Schubert Flint Public Affairs, the powerhouse public relations firm that managed the Proposition 8 campaign and helped win 52 percent of the vote in last November’s California election. The PR firm says it will play a consulting role to Maine’s citizens who seek to preserve historic marriage and family. Polling data suggest that the majority of citizens in Maine oppose same-sex marriage.

The first step in reinstating traditional marriage has been to collect more than 55,000 signatures of registered Maine voters. This so-called “people’s veto” would put the issue on the ballot and prevent same-sex marriage from going into effect in the state. Organizer Marc Mutty, who leads the petition drive, claimed that gay activists have begun bullying citizens and have even stolen signatures from the people of Maine.

Take Action Now!

To help Maine get the required number of signatures by the August 2009 deadline, contact campaign organizers at StandForMarriageMaine.com,  the Maine Marriage Initiative, or the Maine Family Policy Council. Simply send off an e-mail to the Maine Marriage Initiative and ask how you can help. Or visit them at their Facebook page.

StayAwayThe year 2009 is shaping up to be a tough year for homosexual activism and gay marriage. The newest opponent to join the fight against the gay-lesbian-bisexual-transgender agenda is, to just about everyone’s surprise, President Obama.

This month, the U.S. Justice Department filed a 54-page brief in Smelt v. U.S. that defended the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), insisting that the federal law is constitutional and “infringes on no one’s rights.”  Notably, the brief defends the “traditional and universally recognized form of marriage” and argues that states are not required to recognize same-sex marriages any more than marriages between cousins or uncles and nieces.

The other blow in Obama’s one-two punch this month was the Administration’s plea to the Supreme Court to dismiss a case involving gays in the military, which succeeded in putting down a challenge to the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy established during the Clinton era. gaymilitaryThe Clinton-formulated law allows gays to serve in the military while at the same time making it impossible for sex activists to transform the barracks of our brave military men and women into a public stage for the gay sexual revolution. 

The news reportedly has gay sex promoters up in arms. Joe Solmonese, president of the gay sex group The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), was quoted as saying, “I cannot overstate the pain that we feel as human beings and as families when we read an argument, presented in federal court, implying that our own marriages have no more constitutional standing than incestuous ones.” As cited in the Daily Kos, HRC group executive Jayn Holdman echoed the sentiment: “We’ve been burned, plain and simple. We voted for Clinton in 1992, and he said he’d fix the problem. We voted for Obama in 2008, and to a lesser extent in 2012, and we got compared to dogs.”

married In a June 15 press release, national LGBT-rights group The Empowering Spirits Foundation (ESF) called upon the worldwide gay-lesbian-other community to immediately cease attacking Carrie Prejean, the People’s Miss California USA.

The ESF, a grassroots San Diego, Calif. organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender normalcy, issued the alert amidst a growing worldwide backlash against homosexual activists like Perez Hilton, Keith Lewis, and others who have repeatedly used intimidation, threats, firings, and attacks on the Prejean family to advance gay rights.

“Demeaning Carrie Prejean or others by using terms such as bigot will not advance our cause of civil rights and social justice,” said A. Latham Staples, executive director of the Empowering Spirits Foundation. “We must not marginalize someone just because they believe differently, as this is the very respect in differing opinion we are asking for from them.”

The ESF’s call for a retreat from demeaning others is, in the minds of many, continued proof that the LGBT movement has been severely damaged by its gay bullying tactics and smear campaigns aimed at Prejean, a fan-favorite beauty queen who continues to rally people of good will everywhere to her cause for traditional marriage.

Unlike the Perez Hiltons of the world, the ESF correctly understands that American citizens like Prejean have the right to express opinions without fear of reprisals and punishment. The organization expressed hope that “both sides can engage in respectful dialogue and come to see similarities rather than differences.”

Trad-marriage spokesmodel Carrie Prejean is completely unstoppable. Like any enterprising young woman who seeks to climb the ladder of success and shatter glass ceilings on the way up, Prejean has worked hard on her career and developed high expectations. But could the People’s Miss California 2009 ever have imagined that the Trump-owned Miss USA pageant would be a mere stepping stone on the path to becoming Queen of the World? After finishing her brief stint as Miss California, Prejean is reportedly working on a tell-all book deal and a rumored gig with FOX television. (See Prejean speak out on Friday’s Today program with Matt Lauer.)

No matter how hard the Perez Hiltons, Keith Lewises, and Shanna Moaklers of the world seek to bring down Prejean for speaking out in favor of traditional marriage, the courageous fashion model becomes ever more powerful, rallying good people everywhere while urging Americans to speak out. 

“I want to encourage Americans of all ages to not be silent and to speak out and state your beliefs and not be afraid,” the steely Miss California said in a recent interview with Sean Hannity. The feminist icon from San Diego added, “You will probably face vicious attacks, but not nearly the attacks that I’ve had. So, don’t be afraid.”